ArndtS

Hi, 

I’ve checked
the data again, because it’s too bad that the graphs are not reliable for the FAS2750.

 The
port data correspond to the throughput data of Unified Manager after 9 am. But
the node data again show nothing for node A, and also the values for node B are
too low. Unified…

Hi
Jirka, 

I’m
back and checked the data resp. the graphs.

 I’ll think
now it looks good for the port data rate and your fix works! But
there is still one issue I can’t explain and which I mentioned in my last
post: for the FAS2750 oggnap11 the node data rate doesn’t really fit to the…

Hi
Jirka, 

thank
you for your analysis. I’ve installed the patch and will check it. At
the moment I’m out of office until next week Wednesday. So possibly you will get
no feedback from me in the meantime. 



It
still seems that the graphs for the data rate for the nodes and for…

Hi Jirka, at
first sight it looks good. But I’ve
a problem with the FAS2750 oggnap11. Below
is an example for the time from about 11am to 2pm. The graphs for the data rate for the nodes
and for the ports should be similar. But they are not. Especially there are
contributions from ports OGGNAP11A-e0c/e…

Great - thank you!

Hi
Jirka, 



your
grep for oggnap10 is ok, and also that nearly all throughput is on node A and
nothing on node B. This corresponds to the reality and to the representation in
STOR2RRD for the node. 

The
problem is, that in the representation for the ports (e0g/e0h) all…

Hi
Jirka, 

I’ve uploded
the data for all NetApps.

 Is it
possible that there is a missing assignment for the ports to the
node_name as seen in the *cli.dump, like it is there for processor or fcp_lif? 

Hi, I’ve uploaded
logs.tar.gz as well as details.txt with details.

The
issue with the wrong label for the Y axis appears for all NetApps.

 Thanks