Comments
-
I removed and then added the storage with a new name which fixed it.
-
Hi Lukas, logs are uploaded. Thank you!
-
I could have sworn I already did that ;) Volume and drive is now showing up but I see the following issues:- Drives are not named as in the Synology UI, e.g. Drive 4 in stor2rrd shows the performance data of the newly added disk 3 (clearly visible as there is no I/O in the graph before I inserted it)- Drive3 is missing in…
-
@Lukas Thanks for the super fast update! Highly appreciated.
-
@Lukas This fix has not made it into 2.8 sadly. This one here is included: https://forum.xorux.com/discussion/942/error-no-volumes-recognized-on-dx600s5-cli-commands-have-changed#latest
-
Hi Lukas, you are awesome. Thanks for the super fast reply and fix. It works really well!
-
On DX600S5: FUJITSU Storage ETERNUS login is required. [2020-04-02 11:29:09] CLI> show volumes -csv -detail [Volume No.],[Volume Name],[Status],[Type],[RG or TPP or FTRP No.],[RG or TPP or FTRP Name],[Size(MB)],[External LU Info],[UID],[UID Mode],[Copy Protection],[Encryption],[TFOG No.],[TFOG Name],[Data…
-
Thanks Lukas! Highly appreciated.
-
Hi Pavel, Thanks for your quick reply! Really looking forward to having this implemented :)
-
I think I solved it by changing pureperf.pl Add below line 31 my $veeam = "^(VeeamAUX_|VEEAM-StorageLUNClone-|VEEAM-ExportLUNSnap-|VEEAM-StorageLUNSnap-).+"; Change line 832 if ( !defined $element->{name} || !defined $element->{time} || $element->{name} =~ /$veeam/ ) { next; } @Jirka/Pavel Maybe you can include this in…
-
Thanks Pavel!
-
Many Thanks Pavel!
-
Hi, you are right. It is by chance that in our environment the alpahbetical order matches the order the systems were added. Is there a custom sort way or do I have to change the name of the systems to change the order?
-
Rebooting ESX and vCenter solved the problem.
-
Hi, sounds great! Looking forward to it :)
-
Hi Pavel, I tried to find a solution to the problem. Interestingly the combination of instanceuuid and uuid is unique. There are collisions for both seperately but not for the combination. The implementation did not require a lot of changes in the code. Please have a look at the provided patch (uploading files here is not…
-
Hi Pavel, I just analyzed our environment and we have plenty of those system and the effort to change it is really high. It would be great if you find some time to write a patch. I will also have a look at the code an maybe I can provide some sort of patch. Thanks Sascha
-
Just tested, works like a charm. Thanks for your extremely fast help! Highly appreciated!
-
Hi Pavel, Thanks for the fast reply! This sounds like a good solution to me. Can you please check the file? The download is from 2018-05-08 and does not include the fix. Thanks! Sascha
-
Hi Pavel, great job. Works as expected! Thank you very much for this fast fix!
-
Hi Pavel, Thanks for your fast reply. Looking forward to your solution.
Howdy, Stranger!